TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA

In this study, a cottage level technology has been proposed for the commercial exploitation of mushroom biotechnology in Nigeria. The profitability of the mushroom cultivation technology has been established at 2.5, 3.75 and 5.0 tonnes capacities per annum using investment options A or B for two mus...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: ILORI , M. O., ADENIYI , A. A., AKARAKIRI , J. B.
格式: Online
語言:英语
出版: The Faculty of Agriculture Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. 2020
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ija.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/ija/article/view/545
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
_version_ 1810820098205679616
author ILORI , M. O.
ADENIYI , A. A.
AKARAKIRI , J. B.
author_facet ILORI , M. O.
ADENIYI , A. A.
AKARAKIRI , J. B.
author_sort ILORI , M. O.
collection OJS
description In this study, a cottage level technology has been proposed for the commercial exploitation of mushroom biotechnology in Nigeria. The profitability of the mushroom cultivation technology has been established at 2.5, 3.75 and 5.0 tonnes capacities per annum using investment options A or B for two mushroom varieties. Option C becomes relatively marginally profitable for Pleurotus ostreatus only at 3.75 tonnes capacity per annum. Option A entails the complete process of spawn production and mushroom cultivation. Option B involves purchasing the spawn from a separate organisation and then using the spawn for mushroom cultivation while C which is considered for only P. ostreatus involves purchasing the ready-to-fruit spawned bags for incubation and fructification. The engineering economy studies revealed that the venture could be profitable with selling price above one hundred and seventy-four naira (N174) and one hundred and fifteen naira (N115) per kilogram of Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus ostreatus respectively. The study also shows that investors should target the low income group by working towards being a "low-price producer". This could be achieved by adopting the option B with the proposed techniques at above 75% capacity utilization. Profitability and sensitivity analyses show option C to be a relatively risky investment which could easily be affected by competition and price instability. Option B is the most favoured for investors because of the lower capital investment requirement and favourable profitability indices. The business risk is also shared between the mushroom grower and spawn producers.
format Online
id oai:ojs2.ija.oauife.edu.ng:article-545
institution My University
language eng
publishDate 2020
publisher The Faculty of Agriculture Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs2.ija.oauife.edu.ng:article-5452020-10-07T12:23:40Z TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA ILORI , M. O. ADENIYI , A. A. AKARAKIRI , J. B. technological, economic, production, mushroom cultivation. In this study, a cottage level technology has been proposed for the commercial exploitation of mushroom biotechnology in Nigeria. The profitability of the mushroom cultivation technology has been established at 2.5, 3.75 and 5.0 tonnes capacities per annum using investment options A or B for two mushroom varieties. Option C becomes relatively marginally profitable for Pleurotus ostreatus only at 3.75 tonnes capacity per annum. Option A entails the complete process of spawn production and mushroom cultivation. Option B involves purchasing the spawn from a separate organisation and then using the spawn for mushroom cultivation while C which is considered for only P. ostreatus involves purchasing the ready-to-fruit spawned bags for incubation and fructification. The engineering economy studies revealed that the venture could be profitable with selling price above one hundred and seventy-four naira (N174) and one hundred and fifteen naira (N115) per kilogram of Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus ostreatus respectively. The study also shows that investors should target the low income group by working towards being a "low-price producer". This could be achieved by adopting the option B with the proposed techniques at above 75% capacity utilization. Profitability and sensitivity analyses show option C to be a relatively risky investment which could easily be affected by competition and price instability. Option B is the most favoured for investors because of the lower capital investment requirement and favourable profitability indices. The business risk is also shared between the mushroom grower and spawn producers. The Faculty of Agriculture Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. 2020-10-07 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://ija.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/ija/article/view/545 Ife Journal of Agriculture; Vol. 20 No. 1 & 2 (1999): Ife Journal of Agriculture; 10-28 0331-6351 eng https://ija.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/ija/article/view/545/427 Copyright (c) 2020 Ife Journal of Agriculture
spellingShingle technological, economic, production, mushroom cultivation.
ILORI , M. O.
ADENIYI , A. A.
AKARAKIRI , J. B.
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title_full TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title_fullStr TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title_full_unstemmed TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title_short TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MUSHROOM CULTIVATION IN NIGERIA
title_sort technological and economic assessment of mushroom cultivation in nigeria
topic technological, economic, production, mushroom cultivation.
topic_facet technological, economic, production, mushroom cultivation.
url https://ija.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/ija/article/view/545
work_keys_str_mv AT ilorimo technologicalandeconomicassessmentofmushroomcultivationinnigeria
AT adeniyiaa technologicalandeconomicassessmentofmushroomcultivationinnigeria
AT akarakirijb technologicalandeconomicassessmentofmushroomcultivationinnigeria