GENDER ANALYSIS OF URBAN VEGETABLE PRODUCTION IN OJO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA

Urban vegetable production has been discovered to be a viable poverty intervention strategy for the urban poor, and in-depth understanding of the gender perspective to its production is imperative. The study assessed gender analysis of urban vegetable production in Ojo Local Government Area, Lagos S...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: FAPOJUWO , O.E., AYODEJI, A. O., OKUBENA , B.A., AJAYI, M.T., IDRIS , O.
Định dạng: Online
Ngôn ngữ:Tiếng Anh
Được phát hành: The Faculty of Agriculture Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. 2022
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://ija.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/ija/article/view/647
Các nhãn: Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
Miêu tả
Tóm tắt:Urban vegetable production has been discovered to be a viable poverty intervention strategy for the urban poor, and in-depth understanding of the gender perspective to its production is imperative. The study assessed gender analysis of urban vegetable production in Ojo Local Government Area, Lagos State, Nigeria. A snowball sampling procedure was used to select 106 respondents for the study and primary data were collected with the aid of a questionnaire. The average age of the respondents was 45 years, the majority (59.4%) of them were female, 72.6% were married, 48.1% had secondary education, 50.0% hired labour with average farmland of 2 hectares, and farming experience and family size were11 years and five people respectively. Males participated more in harvesting for sale (𝑥̅=3.79) and irrigation (𝑥̅=3.09), while females participated more in marketing (𝑥̅=3.76), purchasing seeds/seedlings (𝑥̅=3.46), and spraying (𝑥̅=3.44). The major reasons responsible for male and female participation in urban vegetable production were a passion for vegetable farming (𝑥̅=4.33) and improved household nutrition (𝑥̅=4.27). Respondents were mostly constrained by high costs of inputs (𝑥̅=2.72), pests and diseases (𝑥̅=2.59), and poor funding (𝑥̅=2.56). Significant (p<0.05) relationships existed between source of farm labour (χ2= 18.38, df=3), farming experience (r=0.22), family size (r=-0.26), andconstraints facing respondents’ production(r=0.28) with participation in urban vegetable production. Significant differences exist between male and female participation in vegetable production (t=1.05, p<0.01). Therefore, providing more financial assistance, seeds and an enabling environment will further enhance male and female participation in urban vegetable production.